PoEM Tokenomics: 80% Compute, 20% Social Mining | ||
---|---|---|
Pillar | Concrete evidence | Status |
1. Reproducible code & binaries |
Tag + hash match: cloning poem-v3.0.2 and running the build script yields identical bytecode to what’s on-chain. Public diff against Dogecoin v1.14.99 shows only the new social-mining, vesting, governance, and LP-mint folders. |
Live |
2. On-chain contract behaviour |
1-click testnet demo proving: • registerHandle → claimSocial → vesting release obeys the 30/100 rules.• unlockDevTranche releases exactly 724,500 PoEM only when oracle data confirms the milestone.• A failed-quorum DAO proposal auto-unlocks 15% of the Dev Fund. |
In Progress |
3. Oracle & metric integrity |
≥ 7 independent oracle signers (hardware keys visible on-chain). Public dashboards (Dune/Flipside) mirroring the “Daily Active Addresses” and “dApp count” feeds. |
In Progress |
4. Multisig hygiene |
3 / 5 keys held by separate legal entities (core dev, external auditor, community foundation). PGP-signed addresses + published key-rotation policy. |
In Progress |
5. Security audits closed out | “Acme Security Audit – PoEM v3.0” (or equivalent) with zero outstanding high/critical findings, and clear commit links for every medium fix. | In Progress |
6. Economic soundness |
Stress-test report modelling: • Social-mining emissions vs. projected hash-rate growth. • Max annual dilution if LP top-ups are hit (≤ 2%/yr). • Five-year supply ceiling stays ≤ ~76M PoEM. |
Planned |
7. Sybil resistance in practice | Public bounty program that tried—and failed—to break the ≥ 30-followers / 7-day rule at scale. Results published. | Planned |
8. Immutable safeguards |
• LP tokens from Day 0 provably locked in the multisig (no withdraw function). • Hard caps baked into LP-mint contract (2% per proposal, 6% per calendar year). |
In Progress |
9. Transparency UX |
Live “Transparency Dashboard” that surfaces: • Dev-Fund balance & unlock history • Vesting progress for social miners & dev team • DAO proposals + turnout stats • LP multisig balance |
Planned |
10. Legal clarity | Public memo (or at minimum a legal-counsel statement) on how PoEM distribution aims to avoid U.S. securities issues—plus jurisdiction for the DAO foundation. | In Progress |
Your friend raises a valid concern, but you're also right—there ARE ways to programmatically lock things down. Here's what's possible and what isn't:
// Example: Immutable supply cap
uint256 public constant MAX_SUPPLY = 69_000_000 * 10**18;
// No function can ever change this
// Example: Permanent LP lock
function lockLiquidity() external {
// Transfer LP tokens to burn address
// Literally impossible to retrieve
}
// Example: Renounced ownership
function renounceOwnership() public {
owner = address(0);
// Contract now has no admin
}
Your best bet: Launch with ownership already renounced, LP locked, and governance fully decentralised from day one. Yes, this means less flexibility, but it's the only way to prove you can't rug.
Allocation | Amount | Destination |
---|---|---|
Compute Mining Pool | 55.2M (80%) | 0x... (immutable contract) |
Social/Kindness Pool | 13.8M (20%) | 0x... (immutable contract) |
Team/Dev/Marketing | 0 | None |
Total | 69M | 100% to community |
The worst we could do: Stop working on it. The protocol would continue functioning exactly as designed — forever.
0x000...dead
github.com/poem/verify
verify:no-backdoors
verify:lp-burned
monitor:whale-alerts
audit:all-wallets